Re. Japanese GP Practice 2 positions?
- started by:
- F1FG
- on:
- October 10, 2017 05:42
I see your point but the system expect someone to have rank to detect him as participating in some event.
The Q3 example is not the right one because drivers in Q3 are ranked by their time in Q2 and time when they made their fastest lap in Q2 so even they to go out in Q3 they still will have different rank for Q3.
Setting all drivers with rank 15 for P2 in Suzuka will be wrong, because imagine that there were only 2 drivers went on the track for that practice. This means that all the rest should have rank 3. That will be so wrong, because some drivers will increase their value even they did not go out on the track. So I believe that the safe middle is to not rank such drivers.
The Q3 example is not the right one because drivers in Q3 are ranked by their time in Q2 and time when they made their fastest lap in Q2 so even they to go out in Q3 they still will have different rank for Q3.
Setting all drivers with rank 15 for P2 in Suzuka will be wrong, because imagine that there were only 2 drivers went on the track for that practice. This means that all the rest should have rank 3. That will be so wrong, because some drivers will increase their value even they did not go out on the track. So I believe that the safe middle is to not rank such drivers.
More about topic
Subject | author | from date |
---|---|---|
Japanese GP Practice 2 positions? | HighOnFuel | October 09, 2017 13:15 |
Re. Japanese GP Practice 2 positions? | F1FG | October 09, 2017 21:18 |
Re. Japanese GP Practice 2 positions? | HighOnFuel | October 09, 2017 23:07 |
+Re. Japanese GP Practice 2 positions? | F1FG | October 10, 2017 05:42 |
Re. Japanese GP Practice 2 positions? | HighOnFuel | October 10, 2017 08:35 |
Re. Japanese GP Practice 2 positions? | HighOnFuel | October 11, 2017 17:00 |
Re. Japanese GP Practice 2 positions? | F1FG | October 12, 2017 05:48 |
Re. Japanese GP Practice 2 positions? | HighOnFuel | October 12, 2017 09:45 |